Tag: serial killers

Captivating Forensic Analysis of the Startling Jeffrey Dahmer Series on Netflix

· Leave a comment ·

Netflix has a way of bringing to life history in a manner meant to bring out our emotions. Serial killers who dismember their victims are thought to be some of the sickest people alive. To think someone could do such horrible things to others is unthinkable yet almost sad, too sad, honestly. This article aims to further study the serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer so we might be able to understand why he committed these heinous crimes.

Why ask?

Forensic psychology requires practitioners to investigate a person entirely. Do they have a mental illness? Do they have a developmental disability? Do they have a neurological disorder causing slowed speech or other cognitive deficits? Is their family and school environment healthy? Are they suffering from substance abuse or anger problems? The job of a forensic psychology professional is to get to the bottom of what is causing the offender to do what they do. Forensic Darkness aims to shed light on the why behind some of serial killers’ worst behaviors.

The study of forensic psychology examines the serial killer’s entire life which includes:

  • Age & environment.
  • IQ & brain functions.
  • Genetics, and mental illnesses.

Netflix truth or fiction

Evan Peters portrayed Jeffrey Dahmer in a relatable way and not as a monster. Dahmer’s demeanor was respectful around others. Dahmer was quiet and did not show any outward emotions even when he was being confronted. The way Evan Peters portrayed Dahmer was as someone who was timid and not the type of person one would think to be a sadistic serial killer.

At an early age, Dahmer struggled with being accepted by his peers. Dahmer became fascinated with mutilating animal bodies, which he did to bond with his father. The act of dismembering animals not only caused Dahmer to become desensitized to such acts, but it also gave him a feeling of control which he later found stimulating. Absorbed with the action of mutilation Dahmer later expressed his curiosity by practicing on humans. Dahmer felt a sense of control and appeared to feel powerful. Dahmer seemed to enjoy those moments he shared with his victims.

The Netflix series showed us that Jeffrey Dahmer came from a broken home and that he suffered from being emotionally neglected, primarily by his mother. Dahmer also feared abandonment because his parents basically left him alone. His fear of abandonment became apparent as we witnessed Dahmer panic each time one of his victims threatened to leave. Dahmer did whatever he could to make sure his victims couldn’t leave including killing them. He resorted to immediate violence if necessary and later when he became more sophisticated as a serial killer, Dahmer began drugging his victims so he could further experiment believing his victims could feel no pain.

Ultimately, Evan Peters portrayed a serial killer who was vulnerable and in desperate need of companionship. Sadly, people who don’t have friends may be socially awkward, meaning they have trouble relating to others. Later, Dahmer was able to find friends in his newfound mostly male nightclub where he was able to try out his alcohol-fused social skills. Having the power to attract others, Dahmer was able to advance on his fascination with dissecting animals as a kid. The Netflix special showed father and son bonding over collecting and dissecting animals but, this did not happen.

Analysis

When it comes to serial killers, forensic psychology professionals ask the question, what is life like for the serial killer? Did the serial killer grow up in a broken home? Do mental illnesses like schizophrenia, anxiety disorders, or other mental illness run in the family?  What could be the real cause of such behavior?

Compulsions drive us. Compulsions can define us and what we decide to do and when. A person who develops urges or compulsions is stuck in a loop. This person behaves in an obsessive way and is habitual to the point of satisfaction. Young Jeffrey obviously felt urges to dissect animals so later when he began his killing spree, he was able to feed his urges in new and utterly grotesque ways. It was as if Dahmer wanted to try new ways to kill, dismember, and torture. This behavior is obsessive. Dahmer experienced compulsions or urges that gave him an emotional and physical biological reward. He felt in control.

Symptoms of mental illness explained:

According to the DSM-V, a person suffering from obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) will have redundant ideas, and thoughts (American Psychiatric Association, 2023). It appears Dahmer developed the need or compulsion to continue his childhood dissection experiments only directly with humans.

To be diagnosed with OCD a person would have to show signs of obsessional thoughts or compulsions for more than an hour a day. Ultimately it seemed that Jeffrey was more comfortable around the dead than the living. In Dahmer’s mind, he was living a real-life horror show each time he killed. After committing the most gruesome acts on his victims, Dahmer admitted that he drugged some of his victims so they wouldn’t feel anything. Do you think this act means Dahmer cares deep down?

Dahmer, driven by his sexual fantasies and impulses, inflicted new and different torture and pain on his victims. To give you a little more background, according to John Hopkins Psychiatry Guide, the act of finding unusual things sexually interesting is called a paraphilic disorder. Parts of the Dahmer show depicted moments when Dahmer became fascinated with the mannequin, which was to become his canvas to paint his upcoming murder dissecting episodes in which he seemed to become aroused sexually.

The way that Dahmer seemed to be aroused when he was torturing or killing his victims shows us that he may have developed a paraphilic disorder over time. A paraphilic disorder is when someone experiences intense sexual urges, and fantasies with the satisfaction to inflict harm on others (Lerner & Berlin, 2017). Basically, the word paraphilia means having a sexual interest in deviant ways such as sexual sadism in the case of Dahmer. The purpose of this article is to speculate on the facts not fiction presented by the Netflix Dahmer movie. For a full overview of Jeffrey Dahmer’s diagnosis take a look at Inside the Mind of Jeffrey Dahmer article.

Sadly, because of the Jeffrey Dahmer Netflix show the family of the victims has had to endure the whole tragedy again. We here at Forensic Darkness can only express our most profound support to the families suffering from these tragic killings. Normal society cannot even begin to comprehend how someone could do such heinous acts. Still, this analysis must be done so forensic psychology professionals can attempt to avoid future serial killers. If you or someone you know is a victim of a murder or serial killer visit our Help for Victims article for tips on what to do next.

Our children, our future

OCD does exist in children. If you have a child, please be aware your child might have OCD so it is up to you as their parent to help guide them onto healthy obsessions. Take the time to talk with them about what they feel so you can gain a better understanding of how your child might think. While the case with Dahmer and his father both bonding from mutilating animals is not real, we need to monitor what our kids are seeing. Unfortunately, when children are constantly exposed to death or killing, they may find the very act itself just a little bit too interesting. As parents we need to show our children that death is not the answer. Show them that love wins every time. Thank you for visiting Forensic Darkness today. Please feel free to leave a comment to further this very interesting serial killer topic and don’t forget to subscribe for future updates!

References:

American Psychiatric Association (2023) What is obsessive-compulsive disorder? Retrieved April 26th, 2023 from https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/obsessive-compulsive-disorder/what-is-obsessive-compulsive-disorder

Lerner, B., Berlin, F. (2017) Paraphilic Disorders John Hopkins Psychiatry Guide.

A Case of Forensic Darkness: “Jack the Ripper”

· Leave a comment ·

Retrospective Analysis & Case Study

By Victor J. Fisher

4–5 minutes

Introduction

Greetings to all you darkness aficionados, Victor J. Fisher here, founder of the Forensic Darkness Organization, and your humble guide through the gruesome and macabre. Today, we embark on a historical journey back to 19th-century London, where we’ll examine the infamous case of Jack the Ripper through the eyes of a modern-day forensic investigator. So, buckle up and prepare yourselves for a wild ride through the foggy streets of Whitechapel, where a shadowy figure once preyed on the unsuspecting. Just remember, dear readers, that while we may jest in the face of darkness, we never lose sight of the respect owed to the victims of these horrific crimes.

“Jack the Ripper”

For those unfamiliar with Jack the Ripper (though I doubt there are many), he was an unidentified serial killer active in the impoverished Whitechapel district of London in 1888. The Ripper’s victims were typically female prostitutes, and he was known for his brutal mutilations and dissections of the human body (Evans & Skinner, 2001). Despite an extensive investigation, the identity of Jack the Ripper remains a mystery to this day, which is perhaps why he’s become such a notorious figure in the annals of crime.

Forensic Techniques of the Time

The 1880s were the infancy of forensic science, and the methods employed by the investigators in the Jack the Ripper case were, well, let’s just say “rudimentary” compared to what we have now. I mean, we’re talking about a time when fingerprints weren’t even a thing yet. However, the investigators did make some notable attempts to solve the case using the tools they had at their disposal.

  1. Autopsies One of the first steps in any murder investigation is the autopsy, and the same was true in the Ripper case. The autopsies of the victims were performed by Dr. Thomas Bond, a well-respected surgeon of the time, who provided detailed reports on the injuries inflicted upon each victim (Evans & Skinner, 2001). Although the autopsies themselves were quite thorough, they, unfortunately, yielded little information that could lead to the identity of the killer.
  2. Crime Scene Analysis
    The investigators of the Ripper case attempted to piece together the sequence of events by analyzing the crime scenes. They looked for patterns in the locations, times, and types of injuries inflicted upon the victims, as well as any potential evidence left behind by the killer (Rumbelow, 2004). Though modern-day forensic investigators would likely scoff at the lack of gloves and DNA analysis, it’s important to remember that these men were pioneers in the field, doing their best with the limited knowledge they had.
  3. Witness Statements
    In the absence of physical evidence, the investigators turned to eyewitness accounts to try to piece together the identity of the killer. Unfortunately, the statements gathered were often contradictory, and many witnesses were considered unreliable due to the foggy conditions and poor visibility in Whitechapel at night (Rumbelow, 2004). It’s no wonder the case remains unsolved – if only they’d had my keen eye for detail!
  4. Profiling
    Surprisingly, the concept of criminal profiling was utilized in the Ripper case, albeit in a more primitive form than what we’re accustomed to today. Dr. Thomas Bond, the aforementioned autopsy surgeon, provided a profile of the killer based on the injuries inflicted upon the victims, suggesting that the Ripper had some anatomical knowledge and was likely a man of solitary habits (Evans & Skinner, 2001). While this may seem obvious in hindsight, Bond’s attempt at profiling was groundbreaking for its time and laid the foundation for the development of modern criminal profiling.
  5. Media Involvement
    The media played a significant role in the Ripper investigation, both as a source of information and as a hindrance. Newspapers published letters allegedly written by the killer, the most famous of which was the “From Hell” letter, which was accompanied by a piece of a human kidney (Evans & Skinner, 2001). While these letters generated public interest and fear, they also muddied the waters and made it difficult for investigators to separate fact from fiction.
Conclusion

Looking back at the Jack the Ripper case through the lens of a modern forensic investigator, it’s clear that the techniques and resources available at the time were woefully inadequate to solve such a complex and high-profile case. However, it’s also important to acknowledge the efforts of the investigators who worked tirelessly to bring the killer to justice, despite the limitations they faced. They were, in many ways, the pioneers of forensic investigation, and their work laid the foundation for the advancements we enjoy today. As we stand on the shoulders of these giants, we must continue to learn from the past and push the boundaries of forensic science to ensure that the darkness is never allowed to prevail. After all, it’s not every day that you get to walk in the footsteps of history’s most infamous serial killer – and I, for one, intend to make the most of it.

References

Evans, S. P., & Skinner, K. (2001). Jack the Ripper: Letters from Hell. Sutton Publishing.

Rumbelow, D. (2004). The Complete Jack the Ripper. Penguin Books.